Irenaeus lived between 135-200 AD. He was considered an apologist as well
as a dynamic theologian. He was raised as a young child in Smyrna and then
moved to Lyons where he witnessed an extremely severe persecution of Christians
there, including the death of his father at a very early age. They say that fifty
to seventy people in two small towns were tortured and executed. Fifty to
seventy people executed in public is a devastating destruction.[1]
He was a student of Polycarp who was a disciple of the Apostle John. He
served as Bishop of Lyons during the latter part of the middle second century (circa.155-180
AD). He is not believed to have been a martyr
for the Christian faith.
Read
Irenaeus’s Against the Heresies on line at:
http://www.newadvent.org/fathers/0103.htm
Irenaeus wrote a five volume set
of books titled “Adversus Haeresus
- “Against the Heresies” of which some fragments of the original autograph
still exist. A complete contemporary Latin manuscript dated to his era is in
existence.
In these books he speaks out strongly against Marcion of Rome and against
another notorious Gnostic teacher named Valentinius, who also teaching in the
city of Rome. Both Marcion and Valentinius taught extremely heretical forms of
Gnostic Christianity. Both distorted the theology of the Old Testament from its
original position with the nation of Israel.
Valentinian Gnostics believed there are three types of humans. The “material
people” who were wretched, and had
no chance of obtaining salvation. These type of humans were doomed to live in
debauchery and lead pointless lives. .
The “psychics” were those
searching for salvation through their own works of faith. They would
occasionally find salvation through some form of esoteric enlightenment.
And finally there are the “spirituals”
who had the special gift of esoteric knowledge that made them superior to other
people. It was believed that these “spirituals”
had a “spark of the divine within
them and that is why they were the greatest of the three human groups.
Marcion’s version of Gnosticism taught that there were two Gods. The one God
of the Old Testament was evil and created the material world that we live in as
mortals. The Old Testament God was often represented as an angry blind fallen
angelic being who hated his own creation.
The New Testament God who was a loving God that sent His light into our
world in the form of the one we know as Jesus. Jesus was an aeon that enlightened
His believers with a form of recondite knowledge that would help them escape
the evil materialism of this world.
In general, all Gnosticism was “dualistic”. This meant that there was a
constant battle between the material world and the spiritual world. All
materialism was evil and needed to be avoided. The goal of the Gnostic was to
transcend materialistic ideals and become a complete spiritual being.
In
addition to his arguments against the heresy of Gnostrocism, Irenaeus was the
first to initiate the formation of the current model of the New Testament canon
we use today – particularly the selection and limitation of the four Gospels of
Matthew, Mark, Luke and John to the Christian New Testament canon. He defended
the fact of four and only four Gospels in a proposed canon because of the four
living creatures around the throne of God listed in Revelation. Generally speaking, from the time of Irenaeus
the New Testament contained practically the same books as we receive today, and
were regarded with the same reverence that we bestow on them today.[2]
In addition, Irenaeus taught the contrast of Adam and Jesus Christ. Adam
ate of the fruit of a tree and Christ died on a tree for our redemption. These
parallels are seen in Paul’s first letter to the church at Corinth in the 15th
chapter.
He endorsed the doctrine of “Apostolic Succession” and the authority of
the Church on earth. In the society and culture Irenaeus experienced, this was
almost a mandated style of government that helped bring discipline into the
process of establishing the Church’s authority against the forces of unrighteousness
in the world. .
Using Galatians 3:28,29 he identified Israel as the Christian Church and
the Christian Church as the Israel of God, the seed of Abraham “There is neither
Jew nor Greek, there is
neither slave nor free man, there is neither male nor female; for you are all
one in Christ Jesus. And if you belong to Christ, then you are Abraham's
offspring, heirs according to promise.”
Eschatologically, he was the first theologian amongst the Apostolic
Fathers that interpreted a literal one thousand year reign of Jesus Christ on
earth at the end of the age. He is often considered to be pre millennial in his
teaching of the second coming of Jesus Christ, even though that term would not
have meant anything to him, had he been exposed to its usage in today’s
theological discussions.
IN ADDITION
FOR
THIS COURSE:
Read
the works of Papias - Bishop of Heiropolis and Friend of Polycarpon line at:
http://www.newadvent.org/fathers/0125.htm
Papias
wrote a
five volume commentary on the “Logos” (Jesus Christ) of which a few fragments
remain. What we knowof this work we learn through 4th century
historian
Eusebius.
[1] Mellowes,
Marilyn From Jesus to Christ (PBS
Home Video DVD, 1998) quote by Elaine Pagels
[2] Thiessen, Henry C. Introduction
to the New Testament (Peabody, Massachusetts, Hendrickson Publishers, 2002)
p.10